Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Defining the Three Structures

In large-scale projects, collaboration between multiple companies often takes one of three legal and organizational forms: Consortium, Joint Venture (JV), or Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). While all three aim to combine expertise and resources, they differ fundamentally in structure, risk allocation, ownership, and financial treatment.

• A Consortium is a temporary contractual alliance among independent entities for a single project, with no new entity formed.
• A Joint Venture establishes a formal partnership, either contractual or as a new incorporated company, for long-term cooperation and shared operations.
• An SPV (also known as a Project Company) is a distinct legal entity created specifically to execute, own, finance, and isolate a project.

Real-World Example: The GIP and KKR-led consortium partnered with Vodafone in 2022 to acquire and transform Vantage Towers, Europe’s leading telecom infrastructure provider, without forming a new entity.

Legal Personality and Ownership

• Consortium: No separate legal personality—each member remains legally independent and performs a defined portion of the project. The consortium agreement governs coordination, responsibilities, and risk sharing.
• Joint Venture: May exist as a contractual JV (no new entity) or an incorporated entity (e.g., LLC). In the incorporated form, partners contribute capital, share ownership proportionally, and participate in profits/losses through a jointly owned company.
• SPV: Always a separate legal entity with its own registration, bank accounts, governance board, and bylaws. Ownership lies with investors or JV partners, but operations are ring-fenced to the project.

Financial Nuance (Accounting): Under IFRS/US GAAP, consortia are accounted for as individual contributions (no consolidation). Contractual JVs use the equity method; incorporated JVs/SPVs allow full/proportionate consolidation, simplifying investor reporting.

Real-World Example: Honda and LG Energy Solution’s 2022 JV (incorporated in the US) for EV battery production shares ownership 50/50, enabling joint R&D and global scaling.

Liability and Risk Distribution

Liability is a key differentiator:

Financial Nuance (Funding): SPVs excel in project finance, attracting non-recourse debt (80-90% of funding) from banks like IFC/ADB, as risks are isolated. JVs rely more on partner equity (50-70%); consortia use member guarantees.

Real-World Example: The Belgrade Waste-to-Energy PPP (Serbia, 2021) used an SPV to isolate €300M in lender risks, shielding parent utilities from operational liabilities.

Duration and Commercial Purpose

• Consortium: Short-term; dissolves post-project (1-5 years).
• Joint Venture: Medium- to long-term; evolves into ongoing business (10+ years for R&D / manufacturing).
• SPV: Project lifecycle (20-30 years); persists for BOT/BOOT/DBFOT models until asset transfer.

Financial Nuance (Tax):

• Consortium: Pass-through taxation, members taxed individually on their share (no entity-level tax; avoids double taxation).
• JV: Contractual = pass-through; Incorporated = corporate tax (21% US, 25% EU) + dividends.
• SPV: Entity-level corporate tax, but deductions for project expenses; tax treaties reduce withholding for cross-border.

Real-World Example: Chevron and Baseload Capital’s 2022 geothermal JV (US/Indonesia) spans 20+ years, sharing ongoing energy revenues post-construction.

When Each Structure Is Most Suitable

Choose based on scale: < $50M = Consortium; $50-500M = JV; >$500M PPP = SPV.

Global Jurisdictional Variations

Structures adapt to local laws—consult jurisdiction-specific counsel:

Example: In India, Adani-L&T Consortium bid for NH projects (2024); EU’s Netflow JV (Ferrovial-Plenary) complies with procurement directives.

Financial Nuance: India SPVs get 100% FDI + tax holidays (Sec 80-IA); EU JVs face 15-25% withholding tax on dividends.

Practical Takeaway

Decision Framework:

1. Quick/One-Off? → Consortium (low cost, flexible).
2. Ongoing Profits? → JV (shared governance).
3. High Finance/Risk? → SPV (isolate + attract debt).

Pros/Cons Summary:

This guide ensures compliance, transparency, and financial security for large-scale collaborations.

Distinction from General Partnerships

While Consortium, Joint Venture, and SPV involve collaboration, they are distinct from a general partnership under most legal frameworks (e.g., US Uniform Partnership Act, UK Partnership Act 1890). A general partnership is a default business structure where partners share unlimited personal liability, equal management rights, and profits/losses without requiring a formal agreement or incorporation. In contrast:

• Consortium: Not a partnership; it’s a contractual alliance with no shared ownership or entity formation. Members remain independent, and liability is typically limited to their scope (unless joint/several in tenders).
• Joint Venture: May resemble a partnership in contractual JVs (e.g., pass-through taxation, shared profits), but incorporated JVs are distinct legal entities (e.g., LLCs), limiting liability and formalizing governance. Unlike partnerships, JVs often have defined objectives and durations.
• SPV: Not a partnership; it’s a standalone entity (e.g., corporation/LLC) with limited liability and project-specific assets, isolating risks from parent companies.

Legal Note: In jurisdictions like the US, a contractual JV may be treated as a partnership for tax purposes (IRS Form 1065), but incorporated JVs/SPVs file as corporations (Form 1120). General partnerships lack the risk isolation of SPVs or the formal equity structure of incorporated JVs. Always consult legal counsel to clarify tax and liability implications.

For further information, visit some of the related Templates:

• Consortium Agreement
• Project Consortium Agreement
• Joint Venture Agreement (JVA)
• Pre-Bid Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) for Tender Participation
• Pre-Bid Agreement
• International Joint Venture Agreement
• Public–Private Partnership Project Agreement (PPP)

References:

• UNIDO – Industrial Development and Project Structures (JV & Consortium use)
  Investopedia – Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) Definition and Use
• OECD – Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships
• World Bank – PPP Knowledge Lab

q